Software architecture is the backbone of any software product and plays a crucial role in its development, maintenance and scaling. This article provides an in-depth understanding of what software architecture is, why it is essential, and how it is constantly evolving in the context of modern technology requirements.
This article was first published on AraCom 🔗. Check it out for other interesting articles.
The essence of software architecture
Every software product has an architecture - whether planned or emergent. A well thought-out software architecture is crucial for the quality, maintainability and extensibility of software solutions. Without a solid architecture, software can quickly become a confusing and difficult-to-maintain system that presents developers with major challenges.
Definition and core aspects
Software architecture refers to the fundamental structuring of a software system and comprises a series of principles and decisions that define the organization of the system, the selection of structural elements and their interfaces as well as their behavior in interaction [^1].
The core of each architecture is formed by the following elements:
- Components: These are the basic building blocks of the architecture, such as modules, classes or packages that implement specific functionalities within the system. A component encapsulates its internal behavior and only communicates with other building blocks via defined interfaces. This means that each component is inevitably interchangeable and reusable.
- Relationships: The way in which these components interact, communicate and exchange data with each other is crucial for the functionality of the entire system. Relationships in an architecture exist between individual elements and with the environment.
- Design decisions: They influence the entire life cycle of the software, from development to operation and maintenance. Design decisions include various patterns and guidelines, such as layered architectures, event-driven architectures or microservices, which are selected depending on the project requirements.
The need for strategic planning
Investing in the architecture at the beginning of a project can be crucial to minimize later costs through troubleshooting and adjustments. A strategically planned architecture makes it possible to identify potential weaknesses at an early stage and to develop efficient, maintainable solutions. As a result, well-planned software can be operated for a very long time and easily adapted to new requirements, instead of having to replace a large legacy application with a new development after a short time.
Importance of software architecture
The role of software architecture goes far beyond the simple structuring of code. It significantly influences the quality and viability of a software product.
Good architecture helps to ensure important quality attributes such as performance, security, scalability and robustness. It enables software to function efficiently and be extended even when requirements change. A selection of quality requirements can be found in ISO 25010 [^2], for example. The quality attributes are individually selected, prioritized and tailored for each project.
In a world where business conditions and technologies are changing rapidly, software must remain flexible. The architecture must be designed in such a way that it can be easily adapted to new requirements without having to redevelop the entire system. Requirements can thus be tracked and developed quickly and consistently, saving valuable time and allowing developers to implement them quickly.
An inadequately thought-out architecture can lead to systems quickly becoming obsolete and difficult to maintain. Forward-looking architecture planning protects against such legacy problems by providing clear guidelines for the evolution of the software.
Factors influencing the software architecture
The design of software architecture is influenced by a variety of factors, which can be both technical and organizational in nature. Understanding and considering these factors is critical to developing effective and sustainable architectures.
- Technological trends: New technologies can expand architectural design options or render existing approaches obsolete. The choice of technology should therefore be made carefully to ensure that it meets the long-term requirements of the project. However, it is important to avoid choosing a particular technology because it is currently in vogue. The choice of technology should come after the selection of requirements and quality features.
- Business strategies and objectives: The architecture must support the business objectives and be flexible enough to adapt to changing market conditions. This requires close coordination with stakeholders to precisely understand and implement business requirements. Not all stakeholders need the same influence or consultation => a good tool for analysis is a stakeholder prioritization matrix ^4.
- Legal requirements: In many industries, such as finance or healthcare, software products must meet strict regulatory requirements. The architecture must therefore be designed to ensure compliance. In such cases, the legislator is usually regarded as a separate stakeholder that must be satisfied. However, the interest of this stakeholder in the product itself is usually very low.
- Standards and best practices: Industry standards and best practices can serve as guidelines for the architecture design and help to ensure the quality and interoperability of the software. Examples are the SOLID or DRY principles.
- Budget and timeframe: These often limit what is architecturally possible. Effective architecture design finds ways to achieve the best results within these limits. It can also identify early on which requirements or features are not feasible within these constraints.
- Skills of the team: The skills and experience of the developers and architects involved play a major role in the choice of architecture strategy. A more complex architecture may deliver better results, but requires appropriately skilled people. In most cases, software architecture development starts with the architect and the product owner or project manager before developers are brought in for implementation. This usually differs according to the organizational structures of the company.
Figure: Example of a stakeholder prioritization matrix ^3
Challenges in software architecture
Developing a robust software architecture is not a trivial process and involves numerous challenges that need to be overcome.
Balance between flexibility and control
One of the biggest challenges is balancing the flexibility of the architecture to respond to change with the need to maintain a consistent and controllable environment. Too much flexibility can lead to an uncontrolled system, while too much control can hinder innovation.
Integration and interface management
The ability to seamlessly integrate and effectively manage different system components is critical. This includes designing interfaces that are both clearly defined and flexible enough to deal with future changes. Designing interfaces requires a deep understanding of the systems involved and the data and functions that are to be exchanged via these interfaces. Interfaces should be regularly reviewed and tested to ensure that they work as expected and have no security vulnerabilities. Automated testing and continuous integration can help to identify and resolve problems at an early stage.
Security and data protection
In today’s digital era, security and privacy are of paramount importance. The architecture must incorporate security mechanisms from the outset to protect both data integrity and user privacy.
Agile development and iterative architecture design
In an agile development process, the software architecture is not viewed as a static element, but as a continuously evolving structure. This approach supports rapid adaptation to changing requirements and enables innovative solutions to be implemented effectively.
Iterative development and feedback loops
Iterative development allows architects and developers to introduce and refine architectural concepts step by step. Regular feedback from stakeholders and end users is crucial to ensure that the architecture meets actual needs.
Team collaboration
Agile architecture encourages collaboration between different roles, including developers, architects, product managers and customers. This collaboration helps to develop a deep understanding of the project’s goals and challenges and to jointly design effective solutions.
Deepening quality assurance in software architecture
An essential aspect of software architecture that is often overlooked is the explicit definition of the problem that the software is intended to solve. Although many architecture documentations contain detailed descriptions of the structure of a system, they often lack clear information about which specific problem is being addressed. This gap makes it considerably more difficult to understand and evaluate the architectural decisions made.
The quality tree according to ISO 25010
The ISO 25010 quality tree is used to comprehensively record and improve the quality of a software architecture. This provides a structured method for evaluating various quality characteristics and their sub-characteristics. Reliability, a central quality characteristic, is further subdivided into fault tolerance and recoverability, for example. Fault tolerance means that the system remains functional even if some components fail. Recoverability, on the other hand, focuses on the rapid recovery of the system after a failure.
Image: Quality tree from DokChess ^5
By using the quality tree, architects can ensure that all relevant quality aspects are taken into account. This promotes a holistic view of software quality that goes beyond the usual focus on availability.
Quality scenarios: Practical application and verification
Despite the structure provided by the quality tree, it is not sufficient on its own to effectively verify compliance with the quality characteristics. This is where quality scenarios come into play. These describe specific events that affect the system and define concrete metrics to measure the desired behavior of the system. Quality scenarios make quality characteristics tangible and easy to verify.
Types of quality scenarios
-
Usage scenarios: They address the requirements arising from the use of the software.
Example: When registering a user, the need to contact customer service should be extremely low, which is achieved through user-friendliness.
-
Change scenarios: These describe how the system should react to planned changes.
Example: support for a new language without changes to the code.
-
Failure scenarios: These relate to the system’s response to failures, such as rapid recoverability without data loss.
These scenarios are not only valuable for evaluating the current architecture, but also point the way for necessary adjustments and further developments. By formulating quality scenarios and developing solutions to fulfill these scenarios, architects can concretely demonstrate how the architecture meets the requirements.
Architectural patterns and strategies
Choosing the right architecture pattern is crucial to the success of a software project. Each pattern offers specific advantages and is suitable for certain types of projects^3. Three of the most common architecture patterns are briefly presented here and their possible applications are shown.
Layered architecture
Layered architecture is one of the most commonly used patterns and divides the system into logical layers of functionality that build on each other. Each layer has a specific task, such as presentation, business logic or data access.
Advantages:
- Clear separation of responsibilities facilitates maintenance and scaling.
- Replacement or expansion of individual layers is possible without major impact on other areas.
Example banking system: A banking system can benefit from a layered architecture as there are strict security and compliance requirements. The separation of the user interface, business logic and data access layer enables security controls and business rules to be implemented and managed efficiently.
Event-Driven Architecture
This architecture is particularly suitable for applications that react to events or messages, such as complex event processing systems or real-time analysis tools.
Advantages:
- High scalability and flexibility through asynchronous processing.
- Facilitates the integration of new components that react to events.
Real-time data processing in logistics: In the logistics industry, where real-time data processing is critical, an event-driven architecture could be used to track and respond to the movement of vehicles and parcels in real time. This model enables fast and flexible responses to unforeseen events.
Microservice architecture
A fundamental characteristic of microservices is their independence: they communicate with each other exclusively via well-defined interfaces. This modularity is supported by design principles such as high cohesion and low coupling, which ensure that each service offers clearly delineated functionality and has minimal dependencies on other services. Internals, such as database schemas, remain encapsulated within the microservices and are not accessible from the outside, which increases the security and maintainability of the overall system.
Advantages:
- Promotes scalability and facilitates continuous integration and deployment.
- Each microservice can be developed and scaled independently, which promotes agility.
Example e-commerce platform: An online shopping portal could benefit from a microservice architecture, as individual services such as order processing, payment transactions and customer service can be developed and scaled independently of each other. This enables rapid updates and improvements to individual parts of the portal without downtime or disruption to the overall system.
further architecture patterns
There are a large number of other architecture patterns, the scope of which would go beyond the scope of this article but are nevertheless worth mentioning:
- Client server: Example often in web applications
- Peer to peer: no central coordination of the nodes
- Broker model: Broker coordinates communication between CLient and services
- Blackboard model: contains “memory” for services
- Main/Worker (formerly Master/Slave): distribution of work to several nodes
- Plug-in: core application that can be extended with new functions using plug-ins
Conclusion
The conventional view of ‘good’ architecture, which is often equated with clean code or scalability, is not sufficient to effectively address quality scenarios. Even the choice of specific frameworks or programming languages is often not decisive for the fulfillment of requirements.
Choosing the right architecture is a critical step that has far-reaching consequences for the performance, maintainability and scalability of a software product. By using established methods, architectural patterns and strategies, developers can create robust systems that meet the requirements of modern business processes and technologies.
The examples show how different the requirements and solutions can be, depending on the specific situation and goals of the project. A thorough analysis of the requirements and careful planning of the architecture are essential to successfully support the long-term goals of software development.
mehr zum Thema lesen
[^1]: “Software-Architektur: Worauf es ankommt” von Eberhard Wolff 🔗
[^2]: ISO 25010 🔗
💬 Comments
Comments are not enabled for this article yet.